|
一切都是规则，规则背后又是什么？当所有的争吵喧闹甚嚣尘上，我们看见景观，景观背后又是什么？ “An elaboration is necessary as far as synopticism goes: is power actually represented in the media? This is an important question. To repeat, Foucault wrote that ‘the pomp of sovereignty, the necessarily spectacular manifestations of power’, have today gradually yielded to the daily exercise of surveillance, in a panopticism in which the vigilance of the intersecting gazes was soon to render useless both the eagle and the sun’. In a two-way and significant double sense of the word we thus live in a viewer society.” ——《viewer society》Thomas Mathiesen 就像一开头她和访谈听众的交流：both victim and perpetrator.当然，相对意义上的。 也如同Tar和Petra在车里念诵的童谣： …… All the birds of the air fell a-sighing and a-sobbing, when they heard the bell toll for poor Cock Robin. 本人纯纯业余，杠就是你对惹，以及纯纯只是在讲这个电影，没有要深化到社会学的意思 ps：我倾向于她去到东南亚是回归本我，或者说回归人，以及尼采认为喧嚣的景观背后是沉默的事件，看到权力建筑时能看到底下是人与人各式的关系网——当然，每个人有不同看法，就如主创在访谈中总是说：leave it to the audience， 补一点惹：最后Tar吐的时候，也有看法是说她回想起了自己关于马勒五的糟糕回忆，或许当Tar从影片观察的特定权力结构中离开的时候，她就不再是权力的景观，就leave it to the audience了 |
